Thursday, June 7, 2012

Pension bill deferred, not discussed in Cabinet

The Pension Bill, which was expected to be discussed in the cabinet meet today, has been deferred. The bill, awaiting clearance on three amendments, was not brought before the cabinet today.
The bill has been stalled for years as political parties squabble over its provisions. UPA's biggest challenge is to bring around its partner Trinamool Congress, which has been dead opposed to the legislation. To pass the Bill in Parliament the government needs numbers and the likely loss of support of the Trinamool's all important 19 MPs in the Lok Sabha have stalled the government mid-step many a time.

The three changes proposed are - to allow a contributor to the pension scheme to withdraw funds in case of an emergency. To give subscribers a minimum assured return on investment and to provide a cap of 26% on foreign direct investment in the scheme. 
The Bill, also called the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Bill, allows pension funds the flexibility to appoint a professional fund management company. Currently, these savings are invested in government securities that offer a fixed rate of return. The changes will affect how savings of nearly 25 lakh Indians are invested.

Also, under the National Pension System (NPS), every subscriber will have an individual pension account, which he can port with a job change. Every government employee hired since 2004 is covered by the NPS and it is voluntary for all other citizens since 2009 including the unorganized sector.

The Bill has repeatedly run into rough weather, with primarily the Left parties, apart from the Trinamool Congress, opposed to it. The BJP wanted the FDI cap of 26 per cent to be included in the PFRDA Bill. The government is said to have finally sewn up the support of the main Opposition party in the last Winter session by agreeing to the amendments it sought.

But, say sources, in the season of new friendships, the UPA government might not be holding its breath this once. The Congress' growing closeness to the Samajwadi Party could ensure that Mulayam Singh Yadav and his 21 MPs will be by the UPA's side on the Pension Bill. The Samajwadi Party chief has so far ruled out any formal equation with the Congress-led alliance that rules at the Centre, but has bailed out the government a number of times on important issues and Bills in Parliament. At a recent dinner to celebrate the UPA's three years in governance, Mr Yadav got higher billing than official UPA allies - he was seated prominently on the dais and then at Congress president Sonia Gandhi's table for dinner. 

Source : NDTV

grant of periodical meetings to NFPE associates


Employees Related - FAQ

1.      What is Pay advance? When in can be availed?

Ø  The employees under orders of transfers are eligible for advance of pay. It is not admissible for request before completion of tenure. Amount of advance is one month’s pay in case of normal transfer and two months pay in case of transfer due to shift of head quarters. It will be recovered in not more than 24 installments.
2.      Whether the Circle head or Divisional head is having the power of dequaterisation of a post attached quarter?
Ø  As per the Directorate orders dt. 06.05.03, the Heads of Circles are competent to cause orders of dequarterisation.

Similarly, the suspension of quarters beyond 90 days enabling the SPM to draw HRA due to inhabited quarters shall be exercised by the circle head only. There is no need to forward such cases to Directorate now.
3.      One Sub PM provided with post attached quarters retired from service. Whether he should vacate the quarters on the date of retirement or keep it for some time?
Ø  As per the Dte Orders dt. 04.10.91, he may be allowed to retain the quarters attached to his post for a period of one month on payment of normal rent.
4.      Whether any Government dues can be recovered from the Group Insurance (CGEGIS) amount?
Ø  No. According to Para 21.2 of the scheme promulgated in 1980, it is not permissible to adjust any Government dues from the Group Insurance scheme amount.
5.      Whether split duty allowance is admissible during the leave period?
Ø  Split duty Allowance in not admissible if an employee is not to attend duty for full calendar month due to leave. It is similar like Transport Allowance
                                                                                (MF OM No. 9 (20)/2000-E II (B) dt. 10.06.2005)   

AGENDA ITEMS FOR THE MEETING OF NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE